StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works" seeks to discuss and analyze how to create a scoring rubric for an essay exam. This, therefore, includes into the discussion available theories of rubric creation and a sample rubric will be produced as a result…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works"

Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Introduction This paper seeks to discuss and analyze how to create a scoring rubric for an essay exam. This will therefore include into the discussion available theories of rubric creation and a sample rubric will be produced as a result. 2. Analysis and Discussion 2.1. What are rubrics? Mertler, (2001) in discussing “Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom” gives the following definitions: Rubrics are rating scales-as opposed to checklists-that are used with performance assessments. They are formally defined as scoring guides, consisting of specific pre-established performance criteria, used in evaluating student work on performance assessments. Rubrics are typically the specific form of scoring instrument used when evaluating student performances or products resulting from a performance task.” 2.2 Types of Rubric Mertler, (2001) further discussed two types of rubrics: holistic and analytic. The author citing (Nitko, 2001) (Moskal, 2000) said, “ A holistic rubric requires the teacher to score the overall process or product as a whole, without judging the component parts separately. In contrast, with an analytic rubric, the teacher scores separate, individual parts of the product or performance first, then sums the individual scores to obtain a total score.” 2.3 When to use each type of rubric? Mertler, (2001) citing Chase (1999) suggested that holistic rubrics are customarily utilized when errors in some part of the process can be tolerated provided the overall quality is high. He cited Nitko (2001) further saying that use of holistic rubrics is probably more appropriate when performance tasks require students to create some sort of response and where there is no definitive correct answer Hence when talking of overall quality holistic is preferable aside from somewhat quicker scoring process than use of analytic rubrics (Mertler, 2001, citing Nitko,(2001). This is basically due to the fact that the teacher is required to read through or otherwise examine the student product or performance only once, in order to get an "overall" sense of what the student was able to accomplish (Mertler, 2001). Mertler, 2001 citing Nitco ( 2001) prefers the use of analytic rubrics when a fairly focused type of response is required, that is, for performance tasks in which there may be one or two acceptable responses and creativity is not an essential feature of the students' responses. He also suggested the use of the same in making assessment on a multidimensional level. 2. 4 Decision to choose type of Rubric A rubric measures performance and measuring performance is just one of the functions of a teacher hence prior to design a specific rubric, a choice scoring holistically or analytically must be made. Mertler (2001) citing Airasian, (2000 & 2001). Specific performance criteria and observable indicators need to be identified at the start. It is the use of the results that could determine the choice of approach. Mertler (2001) cited Montgomery (2001) that if an overall, summative score is desired, a holistic scoring approach would be more desirable but if formative feedback is the goal, an analytic scoring rubric should be used. To measure performance, using either quantitative (i.e., numerical) or qualitative (i.e., descriptive) labels is also a choice and both may also be used sometimes. Mertler (2001) suggested that if a rubric contains four levels of proficiency or understanding on a continuum, quantitative labels would typically range from "1" to "4." but if teachers want more flexibility and creativity, using qualitative labels, might be more useful. 2.5 Converting Rubric to grades Although rubrics are rating scales that measures performance there is nothing that could prevent the teachers by making a more detailed equivalent of the scores. Mertler (2001) suggested that the process of converting rubric scores to grades or categories is more a process of logic than it is a mathematical one. Mertler (2001) cited Trice (2000) as suggesting that in a rubric scoring system, there are typically more scores at the average and above average categories (i.e., equating to grades of "C" or better) than there are below average categories. As an example rubric consisted of several score categories, the equivalent grades and categories might include the grade of A and A+ for Excellent, B and B+ for Good, C+ and C for Fair, and U for Unsatisfactory. As will be seen same categories are used in rubric created in Table I found at the latter part of this paper (Mertler, 2001) (Paraphrasing made). What is important in grade conversion, that teachers must find a system of conversion that works for them and fits comfortably into their individual system of reporting student performance (Mertler, 2001). 2.6 Steps in the Design of Scoring Rubrics Mertler (2001) citing various works from Airasian, 2000 & 2001; Mertler, 2001; Montgomery, 2001; Nitko, 2001; Tombari & Borich, 1999, gives us below a step-by-step process for designing scoring rubrics for classroom use. Step 1: Re-examine the learning objectives to be addressed by the task. This allows you to match your scoring guide with your objectives and actual instruction. Step 2: Identify specific observable attributes that you want to see (as well as those you don’t want to see) your students demonstrate in their product, process, or performance. Specify the characteristics, skills, or behaviors that you will be looking for, as well as common mistakes you do not want to see. Step 3: Brainstorm characteristics that describe each attribute. Identify ways to describe above average, average, and below average performance for each observable attribute identified in Step 2. Step 4a: For holistic rubrics, write thorough narrative descriptions for excellent work and poor work incorporating each attribute into the description. Describe the highest and lowest levels of performance combining the descriptors for all attributes. Step 4b: For analytic rubrics, write thorough narrative descriptions for excellent work and poor work for each individual attribute. Describe the highest and lowest levels of performance using the descriptors for each attribute separately. Step 5a: For holistic rubrics, complete the rubric by describing other levels on the continuum that ranges from excellent to poor work for the collective attributes. Write descriptions for all intermediate levels of performance. Step 5b: For analytic rubrics, complete the rubric by describing other levels on the continuum that ranges from excellent to poor work for each attribute. Write descriptions for all intermediate levels of performance for each attribute separately. Step 6: Collect samples of student work that exemplify each level. These will help you score in the future by serving as benchmarks. Step 7: Revise the rubric, as necessary. Be prepared to reflect on the effectiveness of the rubric and revise it prior to its next implementation. 2.7 An application of the rules of on creating rubric for an essay exam. In applying the rules and steps as discussed above discussed above, an example or rubric for an essay example is shown below. Aspects Criteria (Descriptions of Scoring Levels) Score Editorial Aspect 1: Clarity 1. Paper is well written; no grammatical errors; easy and interesting reading; clear evidence of regular revision & proofing; key ideas are fully elaborated and illustrate what is meant; examples are provided as appropriate 2. Paper is reasonably well written; a few minor grammatical errors; easy and interesting reading; evidence of regular revision and proof reading; key points are made, but not always elaborated. 3. Paper is tolerably well written; a fair number of minor grammatical errors; a few major errors; confusing to reader; no evidence of regular review and revision; key points are made, but not often elaborated. 4. Paper is poorly written; a number of major and minor grammatical errors; essentially unreadable; paragraphs are a jumble of sentences and sentences are a jumble of words; gibberish; key points missing and/or not elaborated. . Paper is poorly written; a number of major and minor grammatical errors; essentially unreadable; paragraphs are a jumble of sentences and sentences are a jumble of words; gibberish; key points missing and/or not elaborated. Editorial Aspect 2: Accuracy 1. Essay shows no discernable errors in fact; well-grounded conclusions. 2. Essay shows minor errors in fact; reasonably well drawn conclusions 3. Essay shows multiple minor errors in fact; poorly-drawn conclusions. 4. Essay shows multiple and gross errors in fact; grossly inaccurate conclusions. Editorial Aspect 3: Precision 1. Essay shows concise statements rather than broad generalities; provides details; provides substantial evidence. 2. Essay shows mostly concise statements but a few broad generalities; moderate use of supporting evidence. 3. Essay shows mostly broad generalities, a few concise statements; very limited use of supporting evidence. 4. Essays shows broad statements of generalities; provides no details and no supporting evidence for claims. Editorial Aspect 4: Compliance with requirements as number of words. 1. Work perfectly matches with requirements 2. Work exceeds or lacks by more or less than 1% 3. Work violates between 2 % tot 5% 4. Work violates by more than 5% Content Aspect 1: Professionalism 1. Work is very professional; material of substantive value; research based; no needed improvement; strong evidence of “deep learning.” 2. Work is more professional; material mostly of substance, but includes some opinions; shows more “deep learning” than “surface learning.” 3. Work is less professional; some material of substance, but lots of personal commentary; shows more “surface learning” than “deep learning.” 4. Work is unprofessional; provides mostly general commentary and personal opinions; strong evidence of “surface learning.” 5. 6. Content Aspect 2: Relevance 1. All statements and assertions are relevant to the topic or bear on the question at hand; assists in clarifying topic or resolving issue 2. Most arguments are cogent, concise, and relevant; a small number of arguments provided and all are well reasoned. 3. Arguments are not always cogent, concise, and relevant; many arguments are given but they are poorly reasoned. 4. Arguments are not cogent, concise, and relevant; few arguments are given and they are poorly reasoned, and insufficient to the task. Content Aspect 3: Logic 1. Arguments supporting propositions as provided are all well reasoned, “win the day” and make sense; conclusions flow from evidence; order of presentation suggests use of a mental outline. 2. Arguments show fairly good use of logic; provides good data, but perhaps draws improper conclusions on the basis of that data; orderly presentation of information and arguments. 3. Arguments show weak logic, perhaps flawed, but attempts to draw appropriate conclusions from the limited amount of data provided; somewhat disorganized presentation of information. 4. There is evidence of flawed logic; draws inappropriate conclusions from data or draws conclusions without supporting data; garbled presentation; lacks logical flow of presentation Content Aspect 4: Depth and Breadth 1. Work fully applies main factors that make the topic important; deals with complexities; identifies difficulties; shows evidence of thorough knowledge of major critical resources; shows full range of subject matter very thoroughly; includes multiple important perspectives if pertinent to topic. 2. Work applies most of the main factors that make this topic important; shows considerable evidence of knowledge of several resources; shows full range of subject matter adequately; includes other important perspectives if pertinent to topic. 3. Work applies some of the main factors that make this topic important; shows some evidence of knowledge of resources; shows full range of subject matter irregularly; provides no or incorrect alternative perspectives. 4. Work applies few if any of the main factors that make this topic important; clearly lacks evidence of appropriate knowledge of resources, shows full range of subject matter poorly; provides biased alternative perspectives Note: Some parts of the above rubric include paraphrased portions of rubric from Illinois State University Physics Teacher Education Program (2005) Conclusion and Recommendation As found out, making rubrics for an essay exam should be guided by the objectives of the teacher. As defined, rubrics are rating scales that are used with performance assessments or scoring guides, consisting of specific pre-established performance criteria, used in evaluating student’s work or performance of a task, so they must accomplished their purpose. But the teacher may have specific purpose of measuring like developing creativity among students of which holistic approach should be preferred, other the teacher is an advised to use analytic approach as was illustrated in this paper. Collecting samples of student work to exemplify each level of performance is also helpful for future benchmarks or allow revision of rubric as necessary to attain effectiveness as desired. Bibliography 1. Airasian, P. W. (2000). Assessment in the classroom: A concise approach (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. 2. Airasian, P. W. (2001). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. 3. Chase, C. I. (1999). Contemporary assessment for educators. New York: Longman. 4. Illinois State University Physics Teacher Education Program (2005), PTE Essay Exam Scoring Rubric, {www document} URL http://www.phy.ilstu.edu/pte/Essay_Exam_Scoring_Rubric.pdf, Accessed September 15,2006 5. Mertler, C. A. (2001). Using performance assessment in your classroom. Unpublished manuscript, Bowling Green State University. 6. Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25), {www document} URL http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25 , Accessed September 15,2006. 7. Montgomery, K. (2001). Authentic assessment: A guide for elementary teachers. New York: Longman. 8. Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: what, when, and how?. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 7(3). Available online: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3 9. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational assessment of students (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. 10. Tombari, M. & Borich, G. (1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom: Applications and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. 11. Trice, A. D. (2000). A handbook of classroom assessment. New York: Longman. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1509204-create-a-scoring-rubric-for-an-essay-exam
(Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words. https://studentshare.org/education/1509204-create-a-scoring-rubric-for-an-essay-exam.
“Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1509204-create-a-scoring-rubric-for-an-essay-exam.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Rubrics In Evaluating Student Works

Student Learning Environment & Scoring Rubric

This paper will examine the core competencies for this program and determine and determine how a nurse educator might achieve the learning environment that works (AACN, 1).... There are many teaching methods available for the nursing educator to use.... The use of these tools must be determined based on the needs of the group of students and the process they must learn....
22 Pages (5500 words) Essay

The Use of Modern Important Skills

My works will evaluate such assessment forms as traditional exams, rubrics, Iq tests open book exams, some methods of evaluating social skills . First it's necessary to determine the assessment.... The methods of evaluating students' knowledge, understanding, literacy and other important skills are becoming more and more important in our days.... he most ancient method of evaluating is oral examination....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Effective Assessment Practices Paper

Assess student readiness for learning -- Any information that the student needs is available to them in some way.... Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are aligned -- students will be informed in this section about the criteria that will be used to evaluate discussions, core concepts, grading and assignments as well as student projects.... Due dates will be clear and each student will know what is expected....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Rubric, Math and Science

Moreover, it utilizes a range in evaluating students' outputs.... The rubrics can aid in evaluating with more consistency.... For instance, it is often better to use checklists than rubrics in assessing tasks that require restricted data.... With some practice, you should be able to make some assessment in just a few minutes after reading or examining a student's work product” (Fiderer, 1999, p.... On the other hand, rubrics are efficient in explaining how certain criteria are reached by the student....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Utilizing Assessment Rubrics to Evaluate Learning

The rubric has been used overtime as an effective guide to both the student in evaluating their learning outcomes (Reveal, 2007 p.... This is such that, by going through the rubric, the student is made aware of what they need to do to garner scores within the highest score brackets.... This essay examines the essentials of an effective rubric in the dentistry-nursing field and gives… To this effect, the paper will address the construction of rubrics that focus on the applying affective, cognitive and psychomotor domain under Bloom's Taxonomy. Reveal (2007) gives one of the uses of an assessment rubric as an instrument to clarify the Using a rubric, students develop a clear sense of what is required of them on a given assignment....
3 Pages (750 words) Assignment

Assessment and Evaluation in the Instructional Design Process

This is seen in the areas in which every student excels and the ones in which they are weak.... "Assessment and Evaluation in the Instructional Design Process" paper describes these essential elements in education and they enhance its effectiveness.... The use of assessment and evaluation in the instructional design process is another reason why these are concepts worthy of study....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Interview with Early Childhood Teachers

The student's understanding of the criteria for evaluating their work enhances objectivity and motivation.... nbsp; In rubrics, we establish the capability of the student to understand the criteria for evaluating their work.... The paper "Interview with Early Childhood Teachers " states that the administration in most cases takes part in the assessment process and is well informed as the assessment continues....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Assessment in Higher Education

According to Andrade and Du (2007), self-assessment is a process that focuses on a formative assessment process where the student gets the opportunity to reflect on their work quality and learning to a degree where they are in a position to reflect on their goals.... In self-assessment, the success of a student is highly dependent on the way they set their goals, portfolios used and the assessment tools used (Nulty, 2010).... This is done by evaluating the peers' performance at work....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us