StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Edwardian Crisis - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "The Edwardian Crisis" it is clear that thanks to a very organized, well-documented approach, Zebel is still able to present a convincing article that is as sympathetic to Chamberlain as Fraser’s equally convincing article is against him…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
The Edwardian Crisis
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Edwardian Crisis"

Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis Fraser discusses the impact of Chamberlain’s tariff reform as itworked to effectively disintegrate the power of the Unionist party in the first years of the 1900s, eventually leading to the party’s defeat in 1906. He argues that, although the party was facing serious problems before Chamberlain began to push his tariff reform policy, it was primarily through Chamberlain’s efforts that the party lost the necessary cohesion and control to maintain its strength in elections. According to Fraser, Chamberlain was able to have this kind of effect because of his astute political maneuvering that gave him a strength among the constituencies that was almost, but not quite, matched by the influential ex-ministers that formed his opposition within the party. In addition, Fraser indicates it was Chamberlain’s inability to keep the strife that existed within the party a secret that led to a disagreement between himself and Balfour that was to last until Chamberlain’s sudden illness and subsequent paralysis that forced him out of the public sphere. The standoff finally came in February of 1906 when Balfour and Chamberlain, unable to come to an agreement regarding what would be discussed at an upcoming Unionist meeting being held on Chamberlain’s insistence, agreed to publish their differences in what has become known as the Valentine Letters. Although Chamberlain’s adherents proclaimed victory for tariff reform, the letters actually gave no quarter and firmly established Balfour as the winner of the contest. However, the division that had been sown to this point served to provide both an inner distraction from greater elections and to weaken the party from inside. One of the chief arguments brought forward by Fraser is that the question over the tariff reform within the Unionist party was not necessarily being fought over whether a general tariff was appropriate or not. Instead, he claims it was being fought more on the grounds of whether it was an appropriate time to make this a prime issue within the party. Although free trade versus tariff reform was certainly a hot issue within the party, Balfour’s main contention against it remained that it was not worth pulling the party apart from within in order to push the issue at that time. Instead, Balfour adhered to a personal policy of ‘cohesion’ that kept both sides from openly committing warfare on each other.1 This changed only slightly after Balfour received word that he would not be held responsible for any adverse effects opposing Chamberlain openly would have on the party. At this point, although Balfour openly admitted he was not keen on the tariff reform policies proposed by Chamberlain, he never opposed them outright, instead falling back on a strategy of delay and redirection.2 Another point that is not developed as well is the idea that Chamberlain was actually a fairly astute politician in working to bring about necessary reform. Although Fraser points out the various ways in which Chamberlain gained support enough to force his own hand in the discussions, he does it in a way that tends to downplay the advantages Chamberlain had at his command. He indicates the strength with which Chamberlain pursues his goals: “When his Liberal Unionist partner, the Duke of Devonshire, who headed the rival Free Food League, objected to this, Chamberlain in May 1904 captured the Liberal Unionist Association and put himself in the Duke’s place as president.”3 Mention is made of how this move enabled Chamberlain to strengthen his hold on the constituencies, which in turn gave him strength enough to compete with the ex-ministers of Balfour’s group, but this discussion is placed so early in the paper and is immediately suppressed under the discussion regarding the opposition and the way in which this division was kept hidden. Nevertheless, Fraser’s argument is convincing. He enumerates several places in which Chamberlain’s own actions to drive his agenda forward actually served to split the party, such as his refusal to heed Balfour’s directive and instead worked “to drive the free traders from the party and to make his programme the official one.”4 Fraser also brings this point to bear by mentioning that Balfour “had seen to it that no fiscal resolutions were endorsed by the party, either voting them out on the ‘previous question’, or by leading his party out of the Commons before a division.”5 He uses authentic sources, often going directly to the sources themselves, as in the papers and letters that were written directly by Chamberlain and by Balfour, as well as by those close to them such as Chamberlain’s wife and Balfour’s secretary, but uses these judiciously to support the arguments he’s making rather than to make the arguments for him. Zebel, on the other hand, paints a very sympathetic picture of Chamberlain as a hero for social reform and the betterment of not only Britain, but also of all of her Colonies. His article focuses on the various reasons why Chamberlain would have decided to take such a politically controversial path, where he obtained his ideas regarding tariff reform and why he ended up in such open defiance of apparent Unionist leadership. Throughout his article, Zebel continues to make the argument that the ideas Chamberlain brought forward were ideas that had already been brought forward, primarily by the National Fair-Trade League, after having already been predisposed to helping the economies of both Britain and the Colonies. “To aid the home economy, he investigated the possibilities of finding new outlets for Britain’s surplus goods and capital in undeveloped areas of the globe”6 in the 1870s. Zebel outlines how Chamberlain slowly came to the realization that tariff reform was a necessary goal beginning with his passion for Imperialism and progressing through his contact with the Colonies as Colonial Secretary. Working within the Colonial office, Chamberlain “instructed the colonial governors to submit detailed reports on the penetration of colonial markets by foreign competitors and to recommend possible means of diminishing such inroads.”7 However, Zebel also argues that the incentive for Chamberlain to pursue tariff reform when he did was an attractive Canadian offer regarding corn. “Chamberlain was evidently so impressed with the offer that he promised to urge its acceptance by the cabinet.”8 He succeeded in winning approval for the proposed deal and then left on a prearranged tour of South Africa, but while he was gone, Ritchie and Balfour, the former outright opposed to the issue and the latter concerned about political consequences, worked to repeal the decision, gaining Chamberlain’s agreement on the heels of his return from South America. Zebel’s argument ends by indicating that Balfour’s wishy-washy decision-making regarding tariff reform is what ultimately placed Chamberlain on the receiving end of hostility within the party. One of the strong points of Zebel’s article is the plausibility of how Chamberlain came to take the actions and positions he took as it relates to tariff reform. By tracing his history as a supporter of the free trade system prior to his involvement in the Colonial office, Zebel traces out how increased awareness of colonial concerns, as well as continuing concern regarding Britain’s stagnant economy, coupled with previous suggestions and current proposals that outline a plausible solution to all of the above finally enticed Chamberlain to take a strong stand on the issue, firmly believing he was working for the betterment of the country. He is also able to present a strong impression that Balfour was quasi-supportive of Chamberlain until the very end, when political concerns forced him to waver. In attempting to portray a supportive stance regarding Chamberlain, Zebel’s argument for a blameless, guileless hero of the realm is somewhat marred by his inability to shed an honorable light on Chamberlain’s decision to infiltrate into the constituencies through the use of branches and flyers portraying his ideas as possible party reform measures. He indicates Chamberlain continued to push for tariff reform by building up his influence on the constituency while keeping himself to the shadows because of a pledge to avoid public controversy.9 As he traces the steps in Chamberlain’s slow conversion from the free trade system to the tariff reform policies he proposed, Zebel makes a convincing argument for an informed individual who has access to a wide variety of sources making the best suggestion for bringing the country out of the financial stagnation it had been experiencing as well as helping out its colonies. His presentation of Balfour indicates Chamberlain was not as staunchly opposed as might have been perceived even while making mention of a glut of media outlets that were opposed to Chamberlain’s ideas. Introducing Ritchie’s actions while Chamberlain was away and Balfour’s inability to stand strong on an issue instead paints an ugly light on these other politicians for blocking progress. Thanks to a very organized, well-documented approach, Zebel is still able to present a convincing article that is as sympathetic to Chamberlain as Fraser’s equally convincing article is against him. While Fraser portrays Balfour as a man sitting on the fence yet leaning strongly toward the free trade faction, Zebel claims Balfour was actually standing on the side of tariff reform until well into the debates, at which time he suddenly switched sides, stabbing Chamberlain in the back. While Fraser blames Chamberlain almost exclusively for the demise of the party, Zebel indicates the divisions were instead caused by outside forces. Footnotes 1 Fraser, P. (1962). “Unionism and Tariff Reform: The Crisis of 1906.” The Historical Journal. Vol. 5, N. 2, p. 150. 2 Fraser, 1962, p. 164. 3 Fraser, 1962, p. 149-50. 4 Fraser, 1962, p. 150. 5 Fraser, 1962, p. 151. 6 Zebel, S. (November 1967). “Joseph Chamberlain and the Genesis of Tariff Reform.” The Journal of British Studies. Vol. 7, N. 1, pp. 132. 7 Zebel, 1967, p. 139. 8 Zebel, 1967, p. 144-45. 9 Zebel, 1967, p. 152. Bibliography Fraser, P. (1962). “Unionism and Tariff Reform: The Crisis of 1906.” The Historical Journal. Vol. 5, N. 2, pp. 149-66. Zebel, S. (November 1967). “Joseph Chamberlain and the Genesis of Tariff Reform.” The Journal of British Studies. Vol. 7, N. 1, pp. 131-57. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis - P Fraser, 'Unionism and Essay”, n.d.)
Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis - P Fraser, 'Unionism and Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536255-article-analysis-the-edwardian-crisis-p-fraser-unionism-and-tariff-reform-the-crisis-of-1906-historical-journal-5-1962-s-h-zebel-joseph-chaberlai
(Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis - P Fraser, 'Unionism and Essay)
Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis - P Fraser, 'Unionism and Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536255-article-analysis-the-edwardian-crisis-p-fraser-unionism-and-tariff-reform-the-crisis-of-1906-historical-journal-5-1962-s-h-zebel-joseph-chaberlai.
“Article Analysis: The Edwardian Crisis - P Fraser, 'Unionism and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1536255-article-analysis-the-edwardian-crisis-p-fraser-unionism-and-tariff-reform-the-crisis-of-1906-historical-journal-5-1962-s-h-zebel-joseph-chaberlai.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Edwardian Crisis

The Development of the Paris Haute Couture

The paper explores how did Paris regain its position as the world center for haute couture fashion after World War II.... The fashion industry originates from the nineteenth century when globalization was taking place in the world.... This industry deals with social commodities.... ... ... ... This paper discusses this in relation to the rising profile of art and fashion in America in the 1950s....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Green Issues in the MICE Sector

14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The True Nature of the Victorian Society

The following paper entitled 'The True Nature of the Victorian Society' presents Victorian England which has been one of the most significant societies which are noted for the moral panics concerning youth and a profound understanding of the youth culture.... ... ... ... Commonly noted as a period of great changes, the Victorian period, the years between 1837 and 1901 under the rule of the great Queen Victoria, was also a time of moral panics....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Reasons for the Credit Crunch

dwardian summer" of prosperity and tranquillity and the trench warfare of the credit crunch - the failed banks, the petrified markets, the property markets blown to pieces by a shortage of credit” (Special report: Credit crisis - how it all began, 2008).... The major reasons for Credit Crunch Introduction The current credit crunch came at an unexpected time, in the in the last year in the month of August, which led to the economic crisis.... It marks the cut-off point between "an Edwardian summer" of prosperity and tranquillity and the trench warfare of the credit crunch - the failed banks, the petrified markets, the property markets blown to pieces by a shortage of credit” (Special report: Credit crisis - how it all began, 2008)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Orlando by Virginia Woolf

rlando passes through several different eras from Elizabethan through the Jacobean era, English Interregnum during King Charles II and the Victorian era to finally the edwardian era and the 19th century.... The only thing which remains consistent about Orlando throughout the course of the story is the brevity of his or her character as Orlando changes selves and goes through various experiences in the midst of an identity crisis.... Thus, his character presents a crisis of belongingness, to each era and later, to either gender....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review

The Unity of Ulster Unionism

The author of the paper highlights that The Unionist party was formed in the late 1800s, as support for the Union of Great Britain and Ireland in 1801, which was the result of Ireland's inability to govern itself in the late 1700s.... ... ... ... On the other side were home rulers, who were the descendants of the liberal party that existed in the early 1800s, who believe that the Irish government should have autonomy up to a certain point while combining its ethos with that of the British....
9 Pages (2250 words) Term Paper

Various Periods and Their Influence on Art and Design

The writer states that art and design are entities that have been applied in society since humanity attained civilization to help aid in the overall development.... Depending on the period, the styles and techniques applied to achieve a completed work have been variable.... ... ... ... Development attributes have been evolving systematically and the behavior of the society may be variable depending on the available technology....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Tourism Marketing: the Radisson Blu Hotel

The following essay 'Tourism Marketing: the Radisson Blu Hotel' seeks to implement the processes of strategic thinking and planning towards the achievement of business objectives as indicated in the Radisson Blu edwardian Group of Hotels.... The following discussion seeks to implement the processes of strategic thinking and planning towards the achievement of business objectives as indicated in the Radisson Blu edwardian Group of Hotels....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us