StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
"The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror" paper examines the historical evolution of habeas corpus, which includes its English and American traditions. The suspension or rescheduling of habeas corpus in U.S. history during the time of the war on terror is also examined…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror"

The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror Insert Insert s The concept of habeas corpus, English in origin, literally means that “you have the body,” which means that the court is capable of forcing the police into producing a prisoner before them to review their case (Clark, 2008). While it is complex when being used, a writ of habeas corpus builds the foundation for the accused rights. It allows one institution of the government that is the court, into checking and balancing the actions of another branch, the police, in criminal proceedings. While the habeas corpus remains as a fundamental right of those that are imprisoned, this inmates’ protection has been tampered with in the American history. Making it; therefore, sometimes a casualty of the American desire for security in times of crisis (Milton, 1989). In the essay, the historical evolution of habeas corpus, which includes its English and American traditions, will be examined. The suspension or rescheduling of the habeas corpus in the U.S. history and its relevance to the contemporary U.S. situation in the time of war on terror will also be examined. The American philosophy of habeas corpus originates in the common law that was brought into the United States from England. Sir William Blackstone in his commentaries on the Laws of England, credited the origin of the Writ of habeas corpus principles to the ancient Saxons who conquered England immediately after withdraw of Roman Empire from British Isles (Howard, 1995). Habeas corpus, therefore, denotes to the legal precedent that holds that an accused may not be detained in custody when there is not just cause. Blackstone described the early purpose of the writ of habeas corpus as ensuing from the assumption that the president of the king should have account at all times, why the liberty of any of their citizens or subjects is restrained, wherever that hold back might be inflicted. Articles 1, section 9, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution upholds the practice of the use of the writ of habeas corpus (Howard, 1995). In the North American history (USA), there has been instances where the writ of habeas corpus procedure being suspended. For an instant, Abraham Lincoln, the president of U.S. succeeded in having it suspended during the Civil. This led to allowing the imprisonment of military members, prisoners of war and any suspended traitors and spies were to be held for the time of the war without being given trial. In addition, Confederate President Jefferson Davis had habeas corpus suspended in the Confederate States of America. During the World War II, the writ of habeas corpus was suspended (Lee and Gamble, 2001). It was in the case of the individual of Japanese ancestry as well as some German prisoners that were held in the United States. In the recent years, in the American history, the writ of habeas corpus suspension has been proposed in relation to persons arrested, suspected or accused to have participated in acts of terrorism. This suspension situation has increasingly become a controversial topic, whereby the American citizens are under the habeas corpus protection while foreigners are currently being held without trial at Guantanamo Bay. According to Shackelford, the contemporary U.S. situation in times of war, habeas corpus plays a significant role. It relates with the right of the defendants whereby they are supposed to be indicted thereafter tried in a timely manner for the crime they have committed (2009). The government must justify the detection of any individual under the right of habeas corpus. The government must depict the reason and the right of holding that person. If they are unable, then they have to release those individuals. In the current continuing war of terror, there have been controversies of the individuals who have the right to habeas corpus. There is debate on whether the government can merely hold individuals for long periods being referred to as the enemy of combatants, without charging the individuals with a particular crime. The interpretation of the writ of habeas corpus by the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to the illegal combatants or enemy combatants is the ruling in the case of Bush versus Boumediene, which was decided in 2008 (Clark, 2008). In the case, it was ruled by the Supreme Court that even the unlawful enemy combatants that were being held at Guantanamo Bay also held the right to habeas corpus. After the 9/11 attacks and the Afghanistan U.S. military invasion, the United States government established a prison camp at Guantanamo Bay. Moreover, the Congress in 2006 passed a law that made it essentially impossible for the war detainees petitioning for the writs of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court in 2008 decided the case of Boumediene. In the case, the Supreme Court rules that the United States needed to extend the right of habeas corpus to persons who were unlawful enemy combatants. It concentrated on those who were captured during the war on terrorism (Shackelford, 2009). What the Constitution say in Article one, Section nine, Clause two is that “the privilege of the rights of habeas corpus shall not be suspended.” It goes further and states that “except when in Case of Invasion or Rebellion; thus the public Safety will definitely require its suspension.” However, the Constitution does not state who is legally allowed to determine if there is an invasion or rebellion. For an instant, can the 9/11 attacks be classified as an invasion? Nevertheless, both the Congress and the President in the Civil War poise a writ of habeas corpus in a single case each (Lee and Gamble, 2001). It implies that both the President and Congress do have some role in the suspension process. The Supreme Court plays a significant role in protecting the civil liberties whereby it can overturn acts of other elected branches. This is when it believes that the stated acts are violating the Constitution. In this capacity, the Supreme Court tries preventing the elected institutions from violating civil liberties. A scenario of this happened in the case of Boumediene verses Bush. In this instant, the Court struck down the law that allowed the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus for individuals who were deemed enemy combatants during war on terror (Clark, 2008). Therefore, when the Court takes such action, it means that it is fulfilling its purpose as protector of civil liberties. In conclusion, my opinion regarding the balance between civil liberties and nation security, should only be restricted if it means that the freedom of one person leads into harming another person. Under the arm principle, people liberties can only be abrogated in support of national security. This happens if it is conclusively proven that there will be harm because of those people being engaged in those liberties (Shackelford, 2009). Therefore, habeas corpus as a cornerstone right in the U.S. criminal justice system goes back to before the American founding of the government. Controversies continue to rise while the use of the writ of habeas corpus has expanded and when the government, via insecurity during crisis, has been seen fit on denying this right (Lee and Gamble, 2001). Instead of diluting it or weakening its meaning, people need to embrace it consistently. References Howard, L and Greg, G (2001). Modern Legal Controversies. New York: New Castle Publishing. Joshua W (2008). Habeas Corpus: Its Importance, History, and Possible Current Threats. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Meltzer, M (1989). Voices from the Supreme Court. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. Scott J (2009). Habeas Corpus Writ of Liberty, Boumediene and Beyond; Cleveland State Law Review, Cleveland State University Press Zinn, H (1995). A People’s History of the United States: 1492 – Present. New York: Harper Perennial. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Final paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 3”, n.d.)
Final paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 3. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1672141-final-paper
(Final Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 3)
Final Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 3. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1672141-final-paper.
“Final Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words - 3”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1672141-final-paper.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

This research proposal "Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the war on terror" delves into the Habeas Corpus and civil liberties.... 466 (2005), the Supreme Court ruled that foreign nationals being held as enemy combatants in the war on terror had the right to challenge their incarceration at Guantanamo Bay.... Further, the United States President authorized the suspension of the Write of habeas corpus in 1863, 1866, and 1857.... Furthermore, United States President Abraham Lincoln suspended the Writ of habeas corpus in April 1861....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Habeus Corpus

Keeping in view the fact that the US Constitution states about the suspension of writ of habeas corpus in Invasion of Public Safety cases, thus, in context to the war on terror, the prisoners cannot enjoy the privileges of writ of teh habeas corpus.... Moreover, the commitment to a mental institution and challenges to the nature of the detention were also became a part of the habeas corpus in the late 1970s.... Due to this reason, the Great Writ, often referred to as the writ of habeas corpus, constitute an important means for the protection of prisoners from unlawful governmental action and imprisnoment....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

The habeas laws

The paper "The habeas laws" examines The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror on the bid to offer protection to the detainees at GITMO and it origin development and existence in the American and British context today.... The notable ones among these include the Vietnamese war, the war with the Iraqi government under the strong leadership of the famous President Sadam Hussein, the war against Osama bin Laden and his Afghanistan based terrorists group, The Al Qaeda, commonly known as the war on terror are some of the most recognized wars that the America government has fought since the end of the cold wars....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

This paper explores the writ of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror and also explores if the move by the president is aimed at protecting the citizens or if it points to abuse of power because the president is the commander in chief.... he Act of habeas corpus in the English law was enacted by the Parliament in 1679 (Rudolph, 2013).... This resarch paper "Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the war on terror" discusses the Writ of Habeas Corpus is an ancient principle of the English common law that was incorporated in the Constitution of the United States in the post-colonial period because of its importance....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

he right of habeas corpus is an English common law product.... In the 17th century, parliament made steps to strengthen the relevance of habeas corpus bringing the King's acts into its scope, hence, creating the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 (Habeas Corpus Act, 1679).... Reflecting back on the relevance of the habeas corpus, the US Constitution provides that detainees have the right to hearings in court to prove their guilt or innocence.... With reference to humanity, fairness, justice, and freedom to equal human rights, habeas corpus provides grounds for appraising executive authority while upholding the relevance of US constitutional provisions....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Habeas Corpus in the War on Terror

The essay "Habeas Corpus in the War on Terror" analyzes the historical evolution of the right of habeas corpus in the US and the suspension of the right on various occasions for reasons of war.... It was for the specific purpose of availing the right of habeas corpus by the detained persons requiring the King or Council to produce them before the court without delay and with a statement for reasons of imprisonment.... Halliday states that instead of serving the original purpose, the right of habeas corpus was 'shackled and collapsed' (Farrel & Rohde, 2010, p....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Historical Evolution of Habeas Corpus

ith this concern, the essay intends to analyze and discuss The Right of Habeas Corpus in the Context of the War on Terror.... The author of the paper "Historical Evolution of habeas corpus" will begin with the statement that the term Habeas Corpus is a writ, which is mainly used as a jurisdiction in federal court.... istorical Evolution of habeas corpus Habeas Corpus is a petition, which has been originated from the English common law during the period of the fifteenth century....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

This paper "Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror" examine the right of habeas corpus, its evolution, and relevance within the judicial context.... the right of habeas corpus prevents the executive from unjustifiably putting people in prison.... the right of habeas corpus is integral protection of Americans' liberties since it ensures the protection of all Americans from unlawful detainment.... Evolution of Habeas CorpusWhile the right of habeas corpus is accepted within American culture, the idea is not originally from the US....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us