StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation in the instructional design process - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
Instructional Design Process Name: Institution: Instructional Design Process Question One The benefit of formative evaluation in the instructional design is that experts in subject matter are a key element to the process (Paas, Renkl & Sweller, 2004). They identify inconsistencies in tasks and performances while providing guidelines on the detection, assessment and looping back of supportive feedback…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation in the instructional design process
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation in the instructional design process"

Download file to see previous pages

Here, the clarity, impact and feasibility of the message and the instruction are determined. In the small group evaluation, the entire group is handed similar feedback based on grouped outcome of the successes or difficulties. This effectively addresses the instruction rather than the learners. In the field trial evaluation, the instructor uses the design and course materials already modified twice to present a full-scale instructional session. Challenges with formative evaluation are often found in feasibility matters.

Students’ capabilities, instructional environment and medium greatly impact the outcome of the stage. The motivation, independence and maturity of individual students will determine the required time to complete the stage (Smaldino, Rusell & Heinrich, 2005). Summative evaluation is beneficial because it is possible to develop consistent, standardized sets of information on each learner. It also creates a justification for wide-scale decision making in education programs. Summative evaluation uses two phases to assess the worth or merit of a program.

The inclusion of external evaluators is beneficial because it adds value to the evaluation and design of the learning process and materials. In the expert judgment phase, feasibility, content, design and congruence analysis are examined. In the field trial phase, outcome and management analysis are examined. It further looks at the impact on the students, job and organization. Essentially, the performance of the group in relation to the set objective is analyzed by the instructional designer in various ways (Gagne, Wager & Keller, 2005).

Organizational resources and needs are aligned with the program through congruence analysis; goals are identified through content analysis; sufficiency of modules of instructional strategies is evaluated through design analysis; and feasibility analysis is in relation to the materials’ utility. Summative evaluation is challenged when it comes to balancing process and product measures and preventing backwards implication; anticipating the scope of positive and negative consequences of using results of summative assessment; attending to both non-cognitive and affective features of flourishing academic programs; and the information’s timeliness (Gagne, Wager & Keller, 2005).

In confirmative evaluation, there is a follow up of the students after they are out of the program. It is beneficial because instructors get to know their competitive levels and how well they are making use of the knowledge and information they gain from their programs. This is a marriage of the other evaluations and programs in continuous improvement. Unlike the other kinds used at the designing and learning levels, confirmative evaluation comes months after implementation of the program (Morrison, Ross & Kemp, 2004).

Endurance of outcomes, efficiency and return on investments are tested. However, the challenge is that the evaluators and students are forced to commit themselves to the full scope of evaluation. Identifying and including all the stakeholders, especially decision makers and activity planners, is also a problem. Question Two Formative assessment is an ongoing measurement in educational preparation aiming at the improvement of student learning. It provides information crucial in the monitoring of an individual’

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative Research Paper”, n.d.)
Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1484652-compares-and-contrasts-formative-summative-and
(Compares and Contrasts Formative, Summative, and Confirmative Research Paper)
Compares and Contrasts Formative, Summative, and Confirmative Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/education/1484652-compares-and-contrasts-formative-summative-and.
“Compares and Contrasts Formative, Summative, and Confirmative Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1484652-compares-and-contrasts-formative-summative-and.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Compares and contrasts formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation in the instructional design process

Educational Technology: Instructional Design and Development

nbsp; According to the paper findings instructional design involves the creation of instructional experiences that enhance the acquisition of knowledge as well as skills in an effective and engaging manner.... There are numerous instructional design concepts and models; however most are founded on the ADDIE model that includes five distinct components.... As a discipline, instructional design is associated historically and structurally with cognitive and physical psychology....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

How Can Classroom Assistants be Utilised More Effectively to Improve Phonological Awareness

This paper highlights that sentiments have also been generally divided on the role of classroom assistants.... Some sectors believe that given an appropriate training, classroom assistants can share noteworthy contributions towards the improvement of the reading skill of young students.... hellip; According to the paper, reading demystifies the unknown and lights the path towards any endeavor....
24 Pages (6000 words) Research Paper

Formative and Summative Evaluation in Educatin

The paper “Formative and Summative evaluation in Education” focuses on evaluation in education, which is the utilization of a precise method to evaluate and investigate the efficiency of a certain program or individual.... Role of formative and summative evaluation in education.... There are four groups in which evaluation can be separated.... hellip; The author states that formative and summative are the two types of evaluation....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Formative and Summative Assessment for Primary Schools in UK

The author of the paper gives a detailed information about summative and formative assessment at the primary level in the UK, about summative and formative assessment, applied for reading classes.... The author also examines the differences between them… The stress of summative assessment is to gather evidence whether students have been progressing as planned.... In reading classes, the summative assessment can focus on whether comprehension scores in reading materials are acceptable....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Formative, Summative, and Confirmative Evaluation: Similarities and Differences

"Formative, Summative, and confirmative evaluation: Similarities and Differences" paper cover the three different types of evaluation processes: formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation.... There are three types of evaluation of instructional design, namely; formative, summative, and confirmative evaluation.... An instructional design is a systematic process in which instructional materials are designed, developed, and delivered while evaluation design is finding out what the design is capable of or what it lacks....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Instructional Design Models

The paper "instructional design Models" describes that the psychomotor domain in Gagne's taxonomy depicts the learning outcome whereby learners demonstrate their motor skills via physical performances whereas the bloom's taxonomy psychomotor domain entails perception.... nstructional Design Models, on the other hand, are basically the frameworks which use instructional design Systems to visualize problems, break them down into simpler discrete forms and manageable units....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Assessment and Evaluation in the Instructional Design Process

"Assessment and evaluation in the instructional design process" paper describes these essential elements in education and they enhance its effectiveness.... The use of assessment and evaluation in the instructional design process is another reason why these are concepts worthy of study.... nbsp;… In conclusion, formative assessment is conducted in the process of learning while summative assessment is done after the learning activity.... On the other hand, evaluation refers to the collection of information about a learning process, the outcomes, context, methods, and content of educational activity....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Instructional Design and E-Learning in Australia

This report "instructional design and E-Learning in Australia" discusses Instructional Systems Design that is said to be the most widely used methodology to aid in the development of new training programs (Kruse, 2009).... This model includes five phases of instructional design, namely, Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.... This kind of systematic approach to instruction design has many advantages to the development of technology-based training....
11 Pages (2750 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us