StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Applicability of Exclusionary Rule - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Applicability of Exclusionary Rule" highlights that generally speaking, the exclusionary rule which was framed by judges during 1914 has undergone tremendous changes. It is still prevalent as there is no alternative rule that has been framed so far. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.2% of users find it useful
Applicability of Exclusionary Rule
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Applicability of Exclusionary Rule"

Exclusionary Rule Introduction: Fourth Amendment to the United s Constitution is one of the provisions included in the Bill of Rights. TheAmendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and was originally designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance. Fourth Amendment was made to protect the interest and rights of citizens and to prevent harassment / intrusion to their personal life and property. It protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures. Under the Fourth Amendment, searches should be ‘reasonable’ and specific. Further, the police officer must prove ‘the probable cause’ to get a search warrant. The Exclusionary Rule was framed by Judges of Supreme Court of US in 1914 (Weeks v. United States) to prevent police from conducting illegal searches and seizures. In fact, the exclusionary rule was found to be necessary to protect the rights guaranteed to Citizens under Fourth Amendment. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle holding that evidence/ witness collected or analyzed which is against U.S. Constitution is inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law . It aims at preventing misconduct on the part of police. Before the precedent was set in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), courts used to admit all evidences irrespective of their relevance / legality. Until the decision in Mapp V.Ohio (367 U.S. 643 (1961) ,the rule was applicable at the Federal level only. After this case, the exclusionary rule was also held to be binding on the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees due process. Applicability of Exclusionary Rule: The Exclusionary Rule applies to all citizens or aliens who reside within the United States. It does not applicable to aliens residing outside of U.S. borders. In United States v. Alvarez ,the U.S. Supreme Court decided that property owned by aliens in a foreign country is admissible in court. Prisoners, probationers, parolees, and persons crossing U.S. borders. Corporations, have limited rights under Fourth Amendment. Requirements of Exclusionary Rule: i. There must be a legal action initiated / taken by a police officer / representative of police. ii. The police officer must have collected certain evidence. iii. There must be connection between illegal action and evidence collected. Exceptions to Exclusionary Rule: The exceptions to the Exclusionary rule are as follows: 1. Independent source doctrine: This exception was discussed in Segura and Colon v U.S in 1984. If evidence is collected through independent source and disqualified and later the same evidence was collected through warrant ,that is admissible. The independent source exception allows evidence to be admitted in court if knowledge of the evidence is gained from a separate, or independent, source that is completely legal. This rule was accepted in People v. Arnau. 2. Inevitable discovery doctrine: This matter was discussed in Nix vs. Williams, in 1984. This doctrine states that if evidence is seized in two ways and if one of the evidences is seized physically through illegal means, and there was also a hypothetical evidence of seizure, that hypothetical evidence can be admitted. The doctrine holds that evidence obtained through an unlawful search or seizure is admissible in court if it can be established that the police have conducted normal investigation to discover the evidence. 3. Good Faith Rule: If the police officer has obtained and produced the evidence in “ good faith” , that evidence is valid .The matter was discussed in United States V. Leon, 468 U.S.897(1984).The Supreme Court held that evidence seized by officers objectively and in good faith relying on a warrant later found to be defective was still admissible. In United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338.[6](1974), the Supreme Court held that the judges may use allegedly illegally obtained evidence in questioning and getting the evidence. However, whether the search conducted for obtaining evidence was legal or illegal can be determined later. In People v. Stith, the Court stated that this doctrine may be used to admit only secondary evidence. However, Supreme Court ruled that the “good faith rule” does not apply to Tax hearings Deportation hearings If the evidence is illegally seized by Government Officials outside United States . When the illegally seized evidence is used to impeach the defendants testimony If the evidence is seized by a Private Party “ Good Faith ” rule applies only to evidences obtained to impeach the defendant and not the third party. 4. The attenuation exception: This exception states that that evidence may be suppressed only if there is a clear causal connection between the illegal police action and the evidence. In People v. Martinez, this exception was used to determine whether there was sufficient attenuation of this connection. In this case , Investigation was carried out about : a) The time period between the illegal arrest and the ensuing confession or consensual search b) The presence of intervening factors or event; and c) The purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct. 5. Civil cases, grand jury proceedings and hearings in parole revocation are also exceptions to the exclusionary rule. “Fruit and Poisonous doctrine” In this context, the discussion on “Fruit and Poisonous doctrine” seems to be relevant. The Exclusionary Rule intends to know how evidence is acquired, rather than what the evidence is. As such, in strict cases, when an illegal action is used by police/prosecution to get the evidence , that evidence will be considered as evidence stemmed from the illegal action and this evidence is known as "fruit of the poisonous tree" . The judge may not consider this evidence . Case Laws: Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886): In this case, defendants room had been searched and papers were seized by officers without a search warrant. The Supreme Court held that If letters and private documents can thus be seized and held and used in evidence against a citizen accused of an offense, the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring his right to be secure against such searches and seizures is of no value, and, so far as those thus placed are concerned, might as well be stricken from the Constitution. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 398 (1914): The Supreme court ruled that The tendency of those who execute the criminal laws of the country to obtain convictions by means of unlawful searches and enforced confessions . . . should find no sanction in the judgment of the courts which are charged at all times with the support of the Constitution” . The exclusionary rule applied only to Federal court. Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957): The Court insisted a requirement that arrestees be promptly presented to a magistrate by holding that incriminating admissions obtained during the period beyond a reasonable time for presentation would be inadmissible. Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960): The exclusionary rule was discarded by a five-to-four majority. The Supreme Court held that the silver platter doctrine (exclusionary rule) was no longer constitutionally viable. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 661 (1961): The supreme court upheld the protection to defendants in state courts as well. United States v. Payner, 447 U.S. 727 (1980): The Court held it impermissible for a federal court to exercise its supervisory power to police the administration of justice in the federal system to suppress otherwise admissible evidence on the ground that federal agents had flagrantly violated the Fourth Amendment rights of third parties in order to obtain evidence to use against others when the agents knew that the defendant would be unable to challenge their conduct under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907 (1984): In the above case, the judges opined that the exclusionary rule generates "substantial social costs,", which sometimes include setting the guilty free and the dangerous at large. We have therefore been "cautious against expanding" it. James v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 307 (1990): In the above case , the court held that “ the impeachment exception applies only to the defendants own testimony, and may not be extended to use illegally obtained evidence to impeach the testimony of other defense witnesses ” Conclusion: The exclusionary rule which was framed by judges during 1914 has undergone tremendous changes. It is still prevalent as there is no alternative rule has been framed so far. It is safeguarding the rights given to Citizens under the Fourth Amendment. As such, abolition of exclusionary rule may not be advisable. In the words of Justice Homes,” outright abolition of the exclusionary rule would reduce the Fourth Amendment to a form of words." ======0====== References: Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1”, n.d.)
LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1543062-law
(LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1)
LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1543062-law.
“LAW Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1543062-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Applicability of Exclusionary Rule

Fourth Amendment: Searchers and Seizures

Fourth Amendment: Searchers and Seizures Professor The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the privacy interest of citizens from unlawful governmental intrusion or unreasonable search and seize by the government.... ... ... ... This is accomplished by barring any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment's protection from use at trial....
21 Pages (5250 words) Research Paper

European Competition Law

European Competition Law Introduction Establishment of single market in European Union has necessitated uniform competition law regime.... Therefore standardization of the statutory framework with regard to competition was introduced.... Article 102 of the Treaty on the functioning of European Union (2008) stipulates “Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States” (Official Journal of the European Union, 2008, C115/89)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Diagnosis and Analysis of Clinical Disorders

The paper "Diagnosis and Analysis of Clinical Disorders" describes that I have disorders in attention deficit as well as in disruptive behavior; for example, oppositional defiant disorders.... The other common group of disorders involves mood disorders.... ... ... ... The reinforcement approach presents a sound way of helping me in assessing the cost and benefits of causes of actions before executing them....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Crime and Protection in America

The Supreme Court has created a 'good-faith' exception to the exclusionary rule where police rely on a search warrant that is later held to be invalid because the magistrate erred in finding probable cause for a search.... This assignment "Crime and Protection in America" presents America that has had major growth in the security industry....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Search and Seizure 4th Ammendment

This paper will deal with the 4th amendment's history, applicability, the rules for exclusion, exceptions made to the requirement of a warrant, and finally compile a number of important cases.... Search and Seizure and the 4th Amendment Name: Institution: SEARCH AND SEIZURE and THE 4TH AMENDMENT Amendment IV of the constitution of the United States is a bill of right' section, which protects citizens against seizures and searches that, may be considered unreasonable....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Supreme Court Decisions and Discussions on the Exclusionary Rule

Supreme Court Decisions and Discussions on the exclusionary rule - Yarborough v.... Unrestricted search was practiced before the exclusionary rule was introduced.... The exclusionary rule was initiated from the Weeks v.... In fact Lee Epstein and Thomas Walk observe “the exclusionary rule provides yet another example of Warren Court's revolutionary treatment of the rights of the criminally accused” (Hensely and Snook, 2006, p....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Author Report on Legal Liability

This has reference to our discussion on the question of applicability of the Party Wall Act, etc.... The assignment "Author Report on Legal Liability" focuses on the critical analysis of the major issues concerning the author's report on legal liability.... 996.... ... ... ... The Party Wall Act, etc....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Evolution of Policing and Investigation

MDP also serves as a local police department performing state, county and Federal roles. ... ... obert is known as the father of the todays policing framework as.... ... ... The initial Scotland police are affectionately called Bobbies after Roberts name and Peelers (unaffectionate). ... ... nclude interdisciplinary such as physics, chemistry, mathematics and geology that aid in the analysis of physical evidence of a It is relevant during investigations where one dies of poisoning....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us