StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Theory of Positivism in Science - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "The Theory of Positivism in Science" highlights that philosophies in social sciences should be examined, even with disagreements.  Humans will never be omnipresent, thus a perfect understanding of true knowledge and truth will never be obtained.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
The Theory of Positivism in Science
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Theory of Positivism in Science"

Science and its Discontents Positivism is the philosophy that true knowledge is scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge can only be determined through theories proven by a strictly defined scientific method. This is an adequate philosophy for sociology, if used with other philosophies for sociology. Alone positivism would leave too many questions unanswered. Positivism, in theory, is based on science and proving theories through a scientific approach. Basically positivism can be defined by one formula: true knowledge=scientific knowledge. When dealing with philosophical discussions that deal with science or numbers, positivism makes for a logical argument. However, when talking about psychology, ethics, and other abstract philosophical discussions, positivism makes little or no sense. For example, Freud wrote about the ego, superego, and the id as parts of an individuals self. Although Freud observed and talked to many patients, these three parts of the self cannot be proven scientifically. Another example is ethics. Different ethics are observed across diverse cultures, with no real determination on right or wrong. These issues cannot be proven conclusively with a scientific method. In order to understand positivism, scientific knowledge needs to be examined. Scientific knowledge is considered to be true. However “If this was the case then there would be no fundamental disagreements” (Smith, 1998:12). Since science changes over time, improving with technology and new discoveries, scientific knowledge is an ever evolving process. For example, the earth was thought to be flat. Travellers went miles and miles believing the earth was flat, because of appearance. Now scientific knowledge states that the earth is round. The true knowledge in this situation is undeniable. The earth is round. When using positivism alone, too many questions remain unanswered for lack of scientific knowledge. Thus the scientific knowledge is not always perfect, because scientific knowledge does not always equal true knowledge. Science is changeable by improving technology, but also by diverse cultural and historical aspects. Smith (1998: 13) explains: Science, as a social practice, is situated in two ways: knowledge is situated socially through the cultural and institutional life of a given community. knowledge is situated historically by examining the shared traditions of knowledge productions. Knowledge continually expands and grows with each generations knowledge being built on the previous generations achievements. Positivism is an adequate philosophy for some parts of sociology, but not all. Positivism looks for what all good philosophies look for; true knowledge. Since humans do not have the power for an all knowing knowledge, their true knowledge lays in the search for true knowledge. True knowledge can only be uncovered grains at a time, not in one huge revelation. When philosophers realise this truth, the search for true knowledge begins. References Benton, T. and Craib, I. (2001) ‘Philosophy and the social sciences’, pp. 1-7, in Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Smith, M. J. (1998) ‘What does it mean for knowledge to be situated?’, pp. 12-15, and ‘Science, observation and experimentation’, pp. 47-53, in Social Science in Question. London: Sage. A Map to Ways of Knowing Benton and Craib (2001:3) questions “How should we view the face of continuing disagreement among social scientists about basics?” This disagreement is a permanent fact of life that should be welcomed. Disagreement, whether about the basics or more complicated aspects of social issues, can help a social scientist to grow intellectually. Only when a social scientist comes to the point of ignoring or dismissing opposing views, does the the disagreement cause damage, stunting a social scientists growth. The only way disagreements become immature is when the social scientist believe their way is the only way, dismissing other ideas and solutions. Having more than one philosophy about knowledge and truth, with the possibilities of more philosophies being discovered, is exciting. I hold the personal belief that truth and knowledge is a never ending process. If humans, social scientists or not, had the means to know all truth and knowledge, life would be boring. There would be no need to search, study, learn, or research any topic. Seeking out knowledge and truth is what makes life fulfilling. The disagreements about basics in social science means that true knowledge and truth has not yet been found. These disagreements allow all social scientists to explore new and old ideas in order to find true knowledge. Along the way on this search, many methods are tested, like Marxism, democracy, and other social elements. Yet even these concepts grow and change with time, and sometimes look better on paper than in reality. Marxism is an example of this. If Marxs ideas had be implemented as he envisioned, an Utopia could have been created. If democracy had been implemented the way envisioned, all would be free, with no discrimination or oppression in democratic countries. The problem is writing a social philosophy and carrying out the concept are not the same thing. Social philosophy and science are not perfect, like the humans that put forth the ideas. This is what causes good ideas to fail, eluding perfect knowledge and truth. It is not realistic to expect to find perfect truth and knowledge from imperfect humans. Knowledge and truth morph through out history and cultures. There is no such thing as a perfect all knowing knowledge and truth for humans. Just because knowledge and truth are elusive, does not mean the search for them should stop. Humans should never stop striving for knowledge and truth. If humans did stop learning, we would still be in the Dark Ages. Even if there is no perfect knowledge and truth, knowledge and truth within the human grasp is still waiting to be learned. Philosophies in social sciences should be examined, even with disagreements. Humans will never be omnipresent, thus a perfect understanding true knowledge and truth will never be obtained. However, humans should continue the search any knowledge and truth they can find themselves or through others. Disagreements allow individuals to think about issues in a different way, giving them new ideas to keep searching. The search for knowledge and truth are what makes life worth living. References Benton, T. and Craib, I. (2001) Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 75-85 and 93-99. Johnson, T., Dandeker, C. and Ashworth, C. (1984) The Structure of Social Theory: Dilemmas and Strategies. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 13-18. Smith, M. J. (1998) ‘Reinventing reality’, pp. 297-304 in Social Science in Question. London: Sage. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Theory of Positivism in Science

Positivism as an Epistemological System

The main difference between inductive and deductive logic is that the former always leaves room for the possibility of error, but positivists maintain that, “that does not stop some claims in science from being supported by evidence” (Godfrey-Smith, 2003, p.... And with the dawn of logical positivism in the 20th century, positivists paired the rigorous scientific method of empiricism with logic and mathematics.... For instance, the influence of positivism grew ever more “in the social sciences, i....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Positivism and Sociology: Theory and Reality

This leads us to naturalism in science.... Thus, Spencer's positive philosophy advocates that “the data collected in science should be directly relevant to formulating or testing the laws on the timeless forces that govern the social universe” (Turner, 2009, p.... Herein is the birth of positivism.... “A distinctive feature of positivism .... In relation to this, another defining characteristic of positivism is its claim that “knowledge comes through experience, especially sense experience” (Sheldon, 2001, p....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Impact of Positivist Perspective on Research Process

The six tenets of positivism are the following (Positivism) Tenet Meaning Naturalism The principles of the natural sciences should be used for social science.... Key Features of positivism are given below (download-it.... Epistemology refers to theory of knowledge.... The purpose of science according to positivists is to observe and measure, and science is the method to get the truth, to understand the world, to predict and control the world....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Integrated Policy versus Integrated Science

This essay will compare and contrast two types of positivism, psychological and sociological, and argue that an attempt to create an integrated theory of criminology would do more harm than good.... This essay will compare and contrast two types of positivism, psychological and sociological, and argue that an attempt to create an integrated theory of criminology would do more harm than good.... This is because, in certain ways, the two strains of positivism, while concerned with similar issues in the larger picture, are not truly compatible as scientific methods of inquiry....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Classical Criminology and Positivism

"Classical Criminology and Positivism" paper discusses classical criminology as opposed to positivism in the field of criminal justice.... This paper proposes to discuss the two approaches: classical criminology as opposed to positivism in the field of criminal justice.... Contrastingly, the school of positivism which followed, introduced the scientific method of the natural sciences for studying criminal behavior.... The second aspect of positivism is solving problems by the scientific method....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Three Tenets of Thought in Latin America - Positivism, Marxism and Existentialism

He delved into all the assumptions which attributes to the theory of positivism and stated that almost all the aspects of positive criminology have been assaulted by radical thinkers.... I will discuss how I came to this belief first by breaking down positivism and its creator and second by examining key components of positivism in Latin America.... eonardo Boff in science, Technology, Power takes a different stand on the issue of Marxism and existentialism in the Latin American culture....
14 Pages (3500 words) Term Paper

The Principles of Positivism

It discusses positivism in terms of methodology, or technical issues of the survey method – is considered nowadays a predominant approach to the construction of social research.... The Principles of positivism ... Auguste Compte's treatise 'The Course in Positive Philosophy' first introduced the terms 'positivism' and 'positive philosophy' that are considered symbols of a recognised mode of thought, and which, according to Mill, are better known through the enemies of this mode of thinking, rather than due to its adherents (1882)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Changes in the Philosophy of Science since the Heyday of Logical Positivism

In addition one of first works by Carnap was a thesis on the theory of space published in 1922.... The move started by the centering the nature through science and persisted through adoption of idealization in science and mathematisation of nature.... Logical positivism in perspective: essays on language, logic, and truth.... Until 1950, logical positivism was the dominant scientific philosophy and up to date its effect persists especially in the manner of undertaking philosophy, in the large attention offered to analysis of scientific thinking and in the positively attained results of technical investigations on the formal logic and theory of probability1....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us